He's trying to get protesters to burn the flags so he can point at them and say they are unamerican and associate them with groups in other countries that burn the US flag.
Its bait.
Hmm... sort of in the sense most of it focuses on the actual facts of the situation. Though most of the discussions tend to be on 'plausible' changes that have far-reaching impacts. Such as Lincoln avoiding assassination or the Eastern Roman Empire being able to hold on for far longer etc.
alternatehistory.com hahaha... Its a place for history nerds who like "What if" scenarios.
Might be stereotypical but... Pink I guess? XD
I agree with the other posters that Its ok to like problematic things as long as you are conscious of their problems and don't get annoyed at those for whom those problematic elements might make the thing distasteful for others.
In my case, unfortunately, I've found that many of those problematic elements in media just make me dislike it, at a far lower threshold than others would have. But, as long as we all respect each-other's reactions, but also recognize the problematic elements, I see no problems with it all.
I'm sure the site will have its shifts as it comes into fruition, but I'm glad to see this initial feeling trying to be woven into it's fabric at the onset.
Hahaha... Yeah. I'm glad this isn't a platform for prejudiced perspectives. You can go back to Reddit for that.
I'm confused. You're going to need to be more explicit.
Perhaps many people want and are happy with a new social media platform that has censorship and promotes a certain political agenda. Thus, the platform wouldn't just disappear due to that aspect.
"I signed up yesterday looking for an alternative social media platform to avoid censorship and biased systems that promote a certain political agenda."
What makes you believe that this social media platform specifically wants to do that?



Politics[Post deleted by author]Nov 29, 2016 at 11:40 AM
