GREAT I look forward to reading them.
What sources? where? I can't take your word for it. That would be unscientific of me. I need to read the evidence myself.
Absolutely, please share links from your multiple reliable sources, I look forward to reading them.
Are you going to post them...or????
Right! It's like being stupid enough to trust a site that was created to promote Russian propaganda and pro-Putin talking points!
Also, still no sources, hm, I wonder why you could be having a hard time finding reliable links. What ever could that mean?
I assume because I disagreed with you. If you really think the WaPo is worse than RT you must be VERY far gone.
How about me? I was AnonJamPhil
Also, question: if multiple sources have verified the supposed facts in that RT article, why not link to them in a roundup instead of a site reasonable people dismiss out of hand since it's full of Russian propaganda and conspiracy theory nonsense?
Where was I disrespectful?
Yup! I was the one pointing out linking to RT was dumb. I look forward to him posting the "multiple sources" that I'm sure are very reliable which verified the facts in that article.
Same, I must say, banning someone for disagreeing with you is very childish!



BannedFromBannedWaaah, I got banned from /bannedOct 05, 2016 at 10:55 AM