"To Kill A Mockingbird" vs. "Go Set A Watchman"

I'm curious about how you compare these two books.

I think "Go Set A Watchman" is actually a braver book than "To Kill A Mockingbird." There is a purity to the morals in "To Kill a Mockingbird." There is an honest confrontation of race relations in "Go Set a Watchman" that isn't easy to digest. There are no kind platitudes from Atticus. In their place are the stinging and very real accusations of the black families young Scout grew up with. I'm grateful for the work "To Kill A Mockingbird" did, and I will always adore the book. But it's a comfortable book by comparison. It's a book that white people can read and think, "Yes, I'm on the right side of history. Yes, I am a good white person who is not racist. Yes, I'm on Atticus' side." But "Go Set a Watchman" forces you to realize that racism is deeper than courtrooms, and even deeper than everyday interactions. It's in the ongoing, systematic way we treat one another and think about each other without questioning those thoughts. It's in the things we rarely think about. I like that "Go Set a Watchman" forced me to face the worst parts of myself--the parts that are just "more comfortable" with white people. I need to be called out for those things. We all do.

Thoughts?