I guess I didn't think of humans when I read mammals. I'm a bit disappointed in myself for that. But my reasoning for bugs is that they have a huge effect on our ecosystem which could save human lives in the event a helpful species of bug were to go extinct, like bees for example.
Yes. I will revive a talking woolly mammoth, and I shall call him furry and we shall be friends. And when he gets sleepy in the evenings, he will turn about on the spot a few times before finding the right position and slumping into a giant, woolly heap. Possibly breaking much furniture in the process. I will also take him to political protests and show him off to my friends, and when people start talking about 'the elephant in the room,' I'll say no no - he's a woolly mammoth, and I brought him back to life just to teach you all a few things about how even when things seem so big and strong and capable of keeping on all by themselves, they are actually really fragile and must be looked after by everyone.
What good would reviving any bugs do? No one is bothered over a particular bee to us all bees are same and do the same. 1 bug of a type can replace another. Mammals include humans and pets so would be much more worth while being able to save them even just once. Now a good question would be. Having opted for the save mammal once option (this would only be hard if you have a dog or cat you love and see as part of family) your pet is dying all your human friends and fall are fine. Do you save your pets life or save the power til a human needs it. I guess most would say save for human but wonder how many would actually let a loved pet die when they could save them?
I guess I didn't think of humans when I read mammals. I'm a bit disappointed in myself for that. But my reasoning for bugs is that they have a huge effect on our ecosystem which could save human lives in the event a helpful species of bug were to go extinct, like bees for example.
Yes! I will save the bees :D
Imagine all the bees we could save!
Yes. I will revive a talking woolly mammoth, and I shall call him furry and we shall be friends. And when he gets sleepy in the evenings, he will turn about on the spot a few times before finding the right position and slumping into a giant, woolly heap. Possibly breaking much furniture in the process. I will also take him to political protests and show him off to my friends, and when people start talking about 'the elephant in the room,' I'll say no no - he's a woolly mammoth, and I brought him back to life just to teach you all a few things about how even when things seem so big and strong and capable of keeping on all by themselves, they are actually really fragile and must be looked after by everyone.
Well, seeing as humans are considered "mammals", I'd go with the second one.
What good would reviving any bugs do? No one is bothered over a particular bee to us all bees are same and do the same. 1 bug of a type can replace another. Mammals include humans and pets so would be much more worth while being able to save them even just once. Now a good question would be. Having opted for the save mammal once option (this would only be hard if you have a dog or cat you love and see as part of family) your pet is dying all your human friends and fall are fine. Do you save your pets life or save the power til a human needs it. I guess most would say save for human but wonder how many would actually let a loved pet die when they could save them?
Reviving one human is MUCH better than some bugs.
I think it would have been more of a thought if it was something like amphibians or reptiles.